Message-ID: <1339282.1075846011807.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 05:27:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: pthompson@akllp.com Subject: RE: LV Cogen Turbine Agreement Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kay Mann X-To: "Thompson, Peter J." X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Lined against 3 sounds good. Circulate to me, Bill, Dale, Lee, Kent Shoemaker. Kay "Thompson, Peter J." on 04/24/2001 12:24:57 PM To: cc: Subject: RE: LV Cogen Turbine Agreement Once these changes are made (on Version 5) and the changes received from the contractor (currently in Version 4) are removed, do you want me to circulate a blackline against Version 3, which I believe was the last version seen by Lee Johnson? If so, who do you want to receive copies of Version 5 of the LV Cogen Agreement? -----Original Message----- From: Kay.Mann@enron.com [mailto:Kay.Mann@enron.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 6:41 PM To: Bill.Williams@enron.com Cc: Thompson, Peter J.; Dale.Rasmussen@enron.com Subject: Re: LV Cogen Turbine Agreement Pete, Finance has requested these changes: Notices to ENA as agent for E-Next. Signature block should be for E-Next Generation, acting through its agent, Enron North America. E Next will not be signing, as ENA will sign on its behalf. Or, ENA, as agent for... Thanks, Kay Bill Williams@ECT 04/23/2001 05:14 PM To: "Thompson, Peter J." @ ENRON cc: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Dale Rasmussen/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: LV Cogen Turbine Agreement (Document link: Kay Mann) Peter, from what I can see, the GE E NExt B/O rev 4 doc appears to be ok. (Scope, $$$, and LDs) Please get it signed and the final distributed to us before April 30th.