Message-ID: <11079530.1075846019016.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 06:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: john.schwartzenburg@enron.com
Subject: Re: World Hunger Contract
Cc: scott.dieball@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: scott.dieball@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: John Schwartzenburg
X-cc: Scott Dieball
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

John,

After considerning what you told me about the job (and what you didn't tell 
me), I've decided to decline the job you aren't offering me.

Kay




John Schwartzenburg@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
05/15/2001 01:14 PM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Scott 
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: Re: World Hunger Contract
  

Avoid confusion?? What in the world does that mean? 

And along those lines, as I was archiving files last night in preparation for 
the move to the Enron building, I can across the resumes that you two sent to 
me when you applied for a job here.  After giving the matter due 
consideration, I have decided not to hire either of you.

 JWVS



	Kay Mann@ENRON
	05/15/2001 11:41 AM
		 
		 To: Sheila Tweed/HOU/ECT@ECT, Scott 
Dieball/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENt, Roseann 
Engeldorf/Enron@EnronXGate, pthompson@akllp.com, John G 
Rigby/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, John 
Schwartzenburg/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: World Hunger Contract


Hi there.

I am attaching for the group's consideration a red line that I ran comparing 
the current working draft (v4) with the draft John R. recently circulated to 
Tax and Insurance. 

I suggest that Pete Thompson keep the typewriter on this.  We are getting so 
close to the end, I would really like to try to avoid confusion.  

I am also attaching a clean copy of the current active version, and the 
current list of issues under consideration.  I suggest we work through this 
list and turn another draft before soliciting Cris/Herman and Lisa's 
comments.  We should also give the ENA commercial reps the opportunity to 
review it at that time.


Kay