Message-ID: <1687791.1075846020108.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 02:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: herman.manis@enron.com, william.fleenor@enron.com
Subject: Re: NRG bullet points
Cc: tom.may@enron.com, william.keeney@enron.com, david.marks@enron.com, 
	janelle.scheuer@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: tom.may@enron.com, william.keeney@enron.com, david.marks@enron.com, 
	janelle.scheuer@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Herman Manis, William Fleenor
X-cc: Tom May, William Keeney, David Marks, Janelle Scheuer
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Herman/Billy,

This is still very early in the process, but some thought as to structure 
options for earning recognition might be worthwhile.  

Kay
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 05/17/2001 09:17 
AM ---------------------------


Kay Mann
05/16/2001 12:36 PM
To: William Keeney/ENRON@enronXgate
cc: Tom May/Corp/Enron@Enron, David Marks/ENRON@enronXgate, Janelle 
Scheuer/ENRON@enronXgate 

Subject: Re: NRG bullet points  

I've made some revisions the Bill's document to make sure we are on the same 
page before I prepare the LOI.  



Do we want to give any sort of description of how the benchmark will be set?
Do we want to mention the cancellation provisions?

Thanks,

Kay