Message-ID: <15194442.1075846022958.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 04:12:00 -0700 (PDT) From: kay.mann@enron.com To: ben.jacoby@enron.com Subject: Re: FW: There is one more revision Debbie made in Paragraph 2b. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Kay Mann X-To: Ben Jacoby X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Hi Ben, I've given it a quick look. Looks a lot different from when I last saw it. I don't see a triggering event on the obligations in 2 a. Was there another fix agreed to by all (maybe the "as required by law" language?) Also, any idea why the service charge language was deleted in b? Maybe it isn't a problem. Also, do you have a copyy of the site plan approval? Talk to you soon, Kay From: Ben Jacoby/ENRON@enronXgate on 05/24/2001 10:14 PM To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: FW: There is one more revision Debbie made in Paragraph 2b. Kay: I'd like to talk to you about this in the morning... -----Original Message----- From: MedleyB@gtlaw.com@ENRON Sent: Wed 5/23/2001 12:19 PM To: Jacoby, Ben; awhite2@enron.com; Krimsky, Steven Cc: Subject: There is one more revision Debbie made in Paragraph 2b. <<7BHL07!.DOC>> I have blacklined it for your convenience. Please call her with any comments you may have. _______________________________________________________________ The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email administrator directly, please send an email to postmaster@gtlaw.com. - 7BHL07!.DOC <<7BHL07!.DOC>>