Message-ID: <17126750.1075846023184.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 01:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: reagan.rorschach@enron.com, david.fairley@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com, 
	tom.may@enron.com, kayne.coulter@enron.com
Subject: ILA/ESMA conflicts
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Reagan Rorschach, David Fairley, Heather Kroll, Tom May, Kayne Coulter
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

What is your preference when there is a  conflict between the interim 
agreement and the last draft (v23) of the ESMA.  (For instance, the 
definition of ancillary services.)  Shall I just ignore the ILA, or does it 
represent the customers' expectations?

Kay