Message-ID: <22356485.1075846027891.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: suzanne.adams@enron.com
Subject: Westinghouse - Gleason
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Suzanne Adams
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

please calendar.
---------------------- Forwarded by Kay Mann/Corp/Enron on 06/07/2001 09:29=
=20
AM ---------------------------
From: Stuart Zisman/ENRON@enronXgate on 06/07/2001 08:47 AM
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron
cc: Don Miller/ENRON@enronXgate=20

Subject: Westinghouse - Gleason

I received a letter from Westinghouse in response to our threat to draw on=
=20
the letter of credit.  A copy is being delivered to you today.  I have spok=
en=20
to Patty Clark (Asst. General Counsel for Allegheny) about what we are doin=
g=20
and she didn=01,t seem overly concerned but asked to be kept in the loop.  =
I=20
told her that Enron was very sensitive about the potential impact that our=
=20
threats against Westinghouse might have on Allegheny=01,s contractual=20
relationship with them.  Personally, I don=01,t think that we should draw o=
n the=20
letter of credit (even though I believe that we are entirely in the right o=
n=20
this one) because it might somehow hurt Allegheny.  I don=01,t, however, wa=
nt to=20
take the heat off of Westinghouse so I have not said anything.

We had a call with Westinghouse yesterday to discuss the facts surrounding=
=20
our claim and have a follow up call scheduled for Wednesday (6/13) at 3:00=
=20
pm.  You are welcome to participate if you would like.  To date, lawyers fr=
om=20
either side have not participated in discussions as they have been primaril=
y=20
fact-finding in nature.  I am happy to give you an update as to what has=20
happened and what I expect to occur on Wednesday at your convenience.

Take care,

Stuart