Message-ID: <32251027.1075845933153.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 05:16:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: chris.booth@enron.com
Subject: Re: LM6000 Change Orders
Cc: kathleen.clark@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: kathleen.clark@enron.com, ben.jacoby@enron.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Chris Booth
X-cc: Kathleen Clark, Ben Jacoby
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Chris,

I would think that we would want to designate which units are affected by the 
provisions of the change orders, to the extent a the change is specific to 
certain units.  What do you think about that approach?

Kay


   
	
	
	From:  Chris Booth                           08/30/2000 11:32 AM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen 
Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: LM6000 Change Orders

Please find attached my versions of Change Order 2 and Change Order 3.

Chris