Message-ID: <25647110.1075845933360.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 01:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: ben.jacoby@enron.com
Subject: Re: LM6000 Change Orders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: Ben F Jacoby
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

I'm at home this am (kid stuff) but will be in around lunch and all 
afternoon.  I'll find you.

Kay


   
	
	
	From:  Ben F Jacoby @ ECT                           08/30/2000 09:50 PM
	

Sent by: Ben Jacoby@ECT
To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: Re: LM6000 Change Orders  

Kay:

Sorry I didn't get back to you on the draft ESA memo. Let's get together 
tomorrow.

Regards,

Ben


   
	
	
	From:  Kay Mann @ ENRON                           08/30/2000 12:16 PM
	

To: Chris Booth/NA/Enron@Enron
cc: Kathleen Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT, Ben 
Jacoby/HOU/ECT@ECT 
Subject: Re: LM6000 Change Orders  

Chris,

I would think that we would want to designate which units are affected by the 
provisions of the change orders, to the extent a the change is specific to 
certain units.  What do you think about that approach?

Kay


   
	
	
	From:  Chris Booth                           08/30/2000 11:32 AM
	

To: Kay Mann/Corp/Enron@Enron, Kathleen 
Clark/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
cc:  

Subject: LM6000 Change Orders

Please find attached my versions of Change Order 2 and Change Order 3.

Chris