Message-ID: <22873928.1075845940138.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 06:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: syoung@bracepatt.com
Subject: Re: FuelCell Talking Points
Cc: dan.lyons@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com, cdade@bracepatt.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: dan.lyons@enron.com, heather.kroll@enron.com, cdade@bracepatt.com
X-From: Kay Mann
X-To: "Susan Young" <syoung@bracepatt.com>
X-cc: <dan.lyons@enron.com>, <heather.kroll@enron.com>, "W. Cleland Dade" <cdade@bracepatt.com>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_3\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Here are my observations:

I'm not certain that an Enron entity will provide a performance guaranty.  I 
agree that the commercial deal is that a portion of the fee will be at risk 
for a performance problem.

Is the reference to the "State" a reference to the DPUC or CRRA?

As far as I know, the CRRA deal is still in the works, with nothing but a 
confidentiality agreement (with an exclusivity provision) signed, and in my 
opinion should not be presented as being a done deal.  

Kay   






"Susan Young" <syoung@bracepatt.com> on 09/27/2000 01:00:40 PM
To: <dan.lyons@enron.com>, <heather.kroll@enron.com>, <kay.mann@enron.com>
cc: "W. Cleland Dade" <cdade@bracepatt.com> 

Subject: FuelCell Talking Points


Attached is a clean and redline version of talking points for today's 
teleconference.  Please call me at (713) 221-1131 with your questions or 
comments.

Thanks.

Scott

 - Discussionpoints.pdf
 - Discussionpointsred.pdf