Message-ID: <17369355.1075855239694.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 10:57:08 -0800 (PST)
From: kay.mann@enron.com
To: clement.abrams@enron.com
Subject: RE: could you send me whatever you consider to be the current
 version of the ENE op?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Mann, Kay </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KMANN>
X-To: Abrams, Clement </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cabrams>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_Jan2002\Mann, Kay\Sent Items
X-Origin: Mann-K
X-FileName: kmann (Non-Privileged).pst

Could you send me whatever you think is appropriate so I can get it in front of the lenders?

Thanks,

Kay

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Abrams, Clement  
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 12:56 PM
To:	Mann, Kay
Subject:	RE: could you send me whatever you consider to be the current version of the ENE op?

Kay,

The revised JVD opinion has him opining as to non-contravention issues with respect to The Portland General Pledge Agreement.  He shouldn't be giving this opinion.  His opinion was originally limited to due authorization only.  This is problematic.

Clem    

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Mann, Kay  
Sent:	Monday, December 10, 2001 12:21 PM
To:	Abrams, Clement
Subject:	could you send me whatever you consider to be the current version of the ENE op?

thanks.

Do you need anything else from me at this time?

Kay