Message-ID: <32226756.1075846134364.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 02:10:00 -0800 (PST) From: richard.sanders@enron.com To: kay.mann@enron.com Subject: Re: Westinghouse 501d memo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Richard B Sanders X-To: Kay Mann X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_4\Notes Folders\Westinghouse X-Origin: MANN-K X-FileName: kmann.nsf Do I need to get involved? Kay Mann@ENRON 01/22/2001 04:50 PM To: "Thomas Hetherington" cc: Subject: Re: Westinghouse 501d memo Yes, this is issue is still around. Thomas, I had some correspondence faxed to you today. In it SW is clearly taking the position that the damage to the generator occured after delivery under the contract. I thought you addressed that well in your memo, however, I have another question. What impact does the use of DDP (Incoterms) have? Is it just one more part of the contract to be taken as a whole, or might it have some greater significance? Will the passage of ROL impact the LD claim? I assume not, but I want a sanity check. Thanks, Kay "Thomas Hetherington" on 12/19/2000 09:47:11 AM To: cc: Subject: Westinghouse 501d memo Attached is a legal memo regarding Westinghouse's delivery obligations with respect to the 501D5A gas turbine generator package. I will forward you an additional copy by fax. TFAH