Message-ID: <3755591.1075846135225.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:08:00 -0800 (PST)
From: reagan.rorschach@enron.com
To: kay.mann@enron.com
Subject: Must Run Situation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-From: Reagan Rorschach
X-To: Kay Mann
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kay_Mann_June2001_4\Notes Folders\Yazoo city
X-Origin: MANN-K
X-FileName: kmann.nsf

Kay,

Item 4 - of the Beck comments

The "must run" condition is when Entergy calls up and declares an emergency=
,=20
Clarksdale has to generate or they have no power.

In a previous version of the LOI David and I had the following language:

Profit from external sales of The Cities=01, power and gas resources and sa=
vings=20
realized by purchase of on-peak market power would be split 60% to The Citi=
es=20
and 40% to EPMI except under first contingency 32 MW =01&must run=018 condi=
tions.=20
If not already running, =01&must run=018 periods will be excluded from the =
profit=20
loss calculation. =20

Something like this could go und the Structure section as item D following=
=20
the "EPMI would be compensated..." sentence which should be item C.