Message-ID: <12664565.1075852163180.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: drew.fossum@enron.com
To: stanley.horton@enron.com, danny.mccarty@enron.com
Subject: RE: MOPS
Cc: dave.neubauer@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: dave.neubauer@enron.com
X-From: Fossum, Drew </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DFOSSUM>
X-To: Horton, Stanley </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Shorton>, McCarty, Danny </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dmccarty>
X-cc: Neubauer, Dave </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dneubau>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged)\McCarty, Danny\Deleted Items
X-Origin: MCCARTY-D
X-FileName: DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged).pst

Understood.  DF

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Horton, Stanley =20
Sent:=09Monday, October 22, 2001 2:16 PM
To:=09Fossum, Drew; McCarty, Danny
Cc:=09Neubauer, Dave
Subject:=09RE: MOPS

We just need to get this closed now.

 -----Original Message-----
From: =09Fossum, Drew =20
Sent:=09Monday, October 22, 2001 10:00 AM
To:=09McCarty, Danny
Cc:=09Horton, Stanley; Neubauer, Dave
Subject:=09MOPS

I wanted to confirm where we are and give you the chance to redirect me if =
necessary.  I understand that John Goodpasture expects to leave, apparently=
 around the end of the month.  I have also been advised that Steve Dowd is =
getting up to speed on the MOPS deal and will be prepared to jump in if nec=
essary.  Per my conversation with John this morning, I understand John inte=
nds to validate the list of open issues with Dan McVay today.  It is possib=
le that the key issue--the "material adverse effect" clause--has been elimi=
nated along the lines you, John and I outlined in your office about 10 days=
 ago.   If not, we will need to discuss with you our recommendation for res=
olving the open issues by tomorrow or Wed. and then present that recommenda=
tion to Stan for his decision as necessary.  Armed with that decision on th=
e scope of our authority, John would be able to try to close the deal this =
week.  If that chronology holds up John's departure plans should not be a p=
roblem.  Otherwise, the handoff to Steve will need to happen and we'll clos=
e the remaining issues as soon as possible thereafter.  I will keep you pos=
ted on any material changes in where we are.  Thanks. DF  