Message-ID: <7274326.1075852170780.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT) From: danny.mccarty@enron.com To: rod.hayslett@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com Subject: RE: Transwestern Cc: tracy.geaccone@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: tracy.geaccone@enron.com X-From: McCarty, Danny X-To: Hayslett, Rod , Harris, Steven X-cc: Geaccone, Tracy X-bcc: X-Folder: \DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged)\McCarty, Danny\Sent Items X-Origin: MCCARTY-D X-FileName: DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged).pst Rod, I'm a bit unclear as to the source of the information contained in the first two sentences of paragraph 2. I think that they should more accurately be worded, "TW benefits from contractual commitments for its firm transportation contracts into California, contracts covering 86% of TW's capacity to California continue through 2005. Long term risk is mitigated by contracts covering 40% of TW's capacity post 2005, and a settlement agreement with current firm customers." This would reflect our position inclusive of Red Rock. I'm not sure where their numbers on expiring contracts came from, but I wouldn't have a problem documenting these. Dan -----Original Message----- From: Hayslett, Rod Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 7:34 AM To: McCarty, Danny; Harris, Steven Cc: Geaccone, Tracy Subject: FW: Transwestern Importance: High Please review and get back to me asap. Rod Hayslett EB4054 713-853-6178