Message-ID: <20943769.1075852170853.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:22:30 -0700 (PDT) From: danny.mccarty@enron.com To: kay.miller@enron.com, joe.hartsoe@enron.com, drew.fossum@enron.com, steven.harris@enron.com, , moore'.'charlie@enron.com, nuschler'.'robin@enron.com, j..porter@enron.com, maria.pavlou@enron.com Subject: RE: Settlement Offer Cc: rkilmer@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: rkilmer@enron.com X-From: McCarty, Danny X-To: Miller, Mary Kay , Hartsoe, Joe , Fossum, Drew , Harris, Steven , '"Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON' , 'Charlie Moore' , 'Robin Nuschler' , Porter, Gregory J. , Pavlou, Maria X-cc: 'Rob Kilmer' X-bcc: X-Folder: \DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged)\McCarty, Danny\Sent Items X-Origin: MCCARTY-D X-FileName: DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged).pst But that allows all parties to game the system rather than to bid the capacity at a value that is compatible with the individual party's economics. Or does FERC not see that as a driver (values at which a willing buyer and a willing seller would transact). This would always put a Seller at a disadvantage. -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Mary Kay Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:15 AM To: McCarty, Danny; Hartsoe, Joe; Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven; '"Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON'; 'Charlie Moore'; 'Robin Nuschler'; Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria Cc: 'Rob Kilmer' Subject: RE: Settlement Offer I agree it uses an interactive tool, ie hottap, but I feel what FERC wants is interactive bidding on the posted capacity, so that all have a chance to see others bids and anti up their bid- EOL doesn't allow that- MK -----Original Message----- From: McCarty, Danny Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 8:11 AM To: Miller, Mary Kay; Hartsoe, Joe; Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven; '"Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON'; 'Charlie Moore'; 'Robin Nuschler'; Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria Cc: 'Rob Kilmer' Subject: RE: Settlement Offer But isn't that exactly what "interactive" means?? -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Mary Kay Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:10 PM To: Hartsoe, Joe; Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven; '"Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON'; 'Charlie Moore'; 'Robin Nuschler'; Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria Cc: 'Rob Kilmer'; McCarty, Danny Subject: RE: Settlement Offer I don't think we can call EOL an interactive open season, since once clicked it is sold- -----Original Message----- From: Hartsoe, Joe Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:17 PM To: Fossum, Drew; Harris, Steven; '"Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON'; 'Charlie Moore'; 'Robin Nuschler'; Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay Cc: 'Rob Kilmer'; McCarty, Danny Subject: RE: Settlement Offer Drew, We need to be careful that we do not provide a marketing affiliate advanced information on capacity availability through EOL. Joe -----Original Message----- From: Fossum, Drew Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:14 PM To: Harris, Steven; '"Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON'; 'Charlie Moore'; 'Robin Nuschler'; Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay; Hartsoe, Joe Cc: 'Rob Kilmer'; McCarty, Danny Subject: RE: Settlement Offer Steve, do you see a problem with using EOL as the IOS process for the operational capacity deals? I don't propose that we get into this level of detail with Staff at this time, but if they like the overall proposal, at some point we'll need to let them know that what we mean by IOS is the EOL process. (I don't see why we'd have to design a new IOS from scratch if EOL works fine) Is anyone nervous that the idea of using EOL as part of our capacity posting and sales process will make it harder to sell a settlement to the Indicated Shippers? -----Original Message----- From: Harris, Steven Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 1:59 PM To: '"Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON'; Fossum, Drew; Charlie Moore; Robin Nuschler; Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay; Hartsoe, Joe Cc: Rob Kilmer; McCarty, Danny Subject: RE: Settlement Offer I am OK with this but with one note. The interactive open season (IOS) mentioned in 1.b. will most likely utilize Enron Online going forward. The current IOS process is no longer available because of system changes. Therefore, any new IOS system will cost us some investment($?). -----Original Message----- From: "Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger" @ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Gallagher+2C+20Boland+20+26+20Meiburger+22+20+3Clwin+40gbmdc+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:49 AM To: Fossum, Drew; Charlie Moore; Robin Nuschler; Harris, Steven; Porter, Gregory J.; Pavlou, Maria; Miller, Mary Kay; Hartsoe, Joe Cc: Rob Kilmer; McCarty, Danny Subject: Settlement Offer Suggested revisions. Steve Stojic - TranswesternSettlementOffer.doc << File: TranswesternSettlementOffer.doc >>