Message-ID: <6204402.1075861253318.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 06:29:54 -0800 (PST) From: danny.mccarty@enron.com To: kay.miller@enron.com Subject: FW: PG&E 2001 Capacity Release Transactions on Transwestern Pipeline Cc: stanley.horton@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: stanley.horton@enron.com X-From: McCarty, Danny X-To: Miller, Mary Kay X-cc: Horton, Stanley X-bcc: X-Folder: \DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged)\McCarty, Danny\Sent Items X-Origin: McCarty-D X-FileName: DMCCARTY (Non-Privileged).pst Mary Kay, It seems that others have benefited handsomely from the volatility in Permian/SanJuan to Cal. border prices. Interesting, isn't it? Dan -----Original Message----- From: Corman, Shelley Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:39 PM To: McCarty, Danny; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly Subject: PG&E 2001 Capacity Release Transactions on Transwestern Pipeline Importance: High FYI While I have been periodically giving updates on the above max rate capacity release activity, I was surprised by the magnitude of the PG&E value above max. rates. For the 12 months ended 9/30/01 we had net cash payments to PG&E. (approx $18 mil revenues to Cal. + $5.6 revenue on San Juan - $28 million in above max rate capacity release activity = ($4.4) million