Message-ID: <12197717.1075841239172.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 10:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: jeffrey.gossett@enron.com
To: kam.keiser@enron.com, errol.mclaughlin@enron.com
Subject: Change to ENA/EES Deals
Cc: scott.mills@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: scott.mills@enron.com
X-From: Jeffrey C Gossett <Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT>
X-To: Kam Keiser <Kam Keiser/HOU/ECT@ECT>, Errol McLaughlin <Errol McLaughlin/Corp/Enron@ENRON>
X-cc: Scott Mills <Scott Mills/HOU/EES@EES>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - McLaughlin Jr., Errol\Gossett
X-Origin: MCLAUGHLIN-E
X-FileName: erol mclaughlin 6-26-02.PST

Please change the deals in your books.

Thanks
---------------------- Forwarded by Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT on 05/02/2001 07:19 AM ---------------------------
From:	Scott Mills@EES on 05/01/2001 08:53 PM
To:	Jeffrey C Gossett/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:	Russ Kavanaugh/HOU/EES@EES 
Subject:	Change to ENA/EES Deals

Can the following deals be rebooked using the current intercompany methodology:

	Buyer = Enron Energy Services
	Seller = Enron North America (or RMT if these are all financial)

Then what is now the counterparties on the deal will become the books. 

These are the only deals that are left that are booked the old way.  I was  hoping to make things consistent.  Two of the deals (EH1958.1, EH4242.5) will roll off the end of May -the others have months to go.

Thanks for the help

SRM (x33548)