Message-ID: <11997514.1075841341947.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:00:14 -0800 (PST)
From: paul.choi@enron.com
To: matt.motley@enron.com
Subject: FW: spark-spread call
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Choi, Paul </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PCHOI>
X-To: Motley, Matt </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mmotley>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Motley, Matt\Inbox\ENE Portland\Middle Market
X-Origin: MOTLEY-M
X-FileName: matt motley 6-26-02.pst



-----Original Message-----
From: kreeves@reliant.com [mailto:kreeves@reliant.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Choi, Paul
Subject: RE: spark-spread call



Paul:

Here are the particulars again:

Term:          1/1/04 - 12/31/08
Volume:   50 - 100 MW
Heat Rate:     7.4 MMBtu /Mwh
Index:         SoCal + $.05
Delivery: Mead / LD / Physical


This would be on a 7x24 basis, though we would consider a structure which
would allow you the optionality to exercise peak on and off peak
as seperate options.  Let me know what you think.

KR