Message-ID: <18674595.1075842621253.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 06:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: kckrisa@apex2000.net
Subject: Re: November Nominations
Cc: joan.quick@enron.com, mark.whitt@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: joan.quick@enron.com, mark.whitt@enron.com
X-From: Gerald Nemec
X-To: <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
X-cc: Joan Quick, Mark Whitt
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: gnemec.nsf

We should again nominate to NWPL .  In our nomination we can state that if 
Wildhorse again wrongfully rejects our nom to NWPL, we then nominate to 
Questar solely to mitigate damages.  I can draft the appropriate letter.

Joan or Ken,

Will the nominations be done via the web site?  Do we have the information to 
nominate to NWPL via the website?
 



	"Ken" <kckrisa@apex2000.net>
	10/23/2000 08:57 AM
	Please respond to kckrisa
		 
		 To: "Joan Quick \(E-mail\)" <joan.quick@enron.com>, "Gerald R. Nemec 
\(E-mail\)" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
		 cc: 
		 Subject: November Nominations


Joan, Gerald;

What is the game plan for November nominations?  Do we want to go through
the same deal as before and nominate on NWPL, get rejected, and renominate
on Questar?  Or, do we want to nominate on Questar and include a statement
that we are nominating on Questar only because of last month's ordeal?

Tom Brown and Wildhorse are supposed to close today - if they didn't get
their late last Friday.

Ken Krisa