Message-ID: <29318178.1075842621276.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 06:21:00 -0700 (PDT) From: joan.quick@enron.com To: gerald.nemec@enron.com Subject: Re: November Nominations Cc: kckrisa@apex2000.net, mark.whitt@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: kckrisa@apex2000.net, mark.whitt@enron.com X-From: Joan Quick X-To: Gerald Nemec X-cc: , Mark Whitt X-bcc: X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: NEMEC-G X-FileName: gnemec.nsf The noms can only be done via the internet if we have a Wildhorse/NWPL transport contract number. And as far as I know, they still will not give us one. So, we can either : 1) obtain the Wildhorse/NWPL transport contract number from Tom Brown and nom via the internet to NWPL; 2) if not, nom via internet into Questar and fax letter; or 3) fax nom to Questar, along with letter. Mark - what do you think our chances of getting a Wildhorse/NWPL transport contract number are? joan To: cc: Joan Quick/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Whitt/NA/Enron@Enron Subject: Re: November Nominations We should again nominate to NWPL . In our nomination we can state that if Wildhorse again wrongfully rejects our nom to NWPL, we then nominate to Questar solely to mitigate damages. I can draft the appropriate letter. Joan or Ken, Will the nominations be done via the web site? Do we have the information to nominate to NWPL via the website? "Ken" 10/23/2000 08:57 AM Please respond to kckrisa To: "Joan Quick \(E-mail\)" , "Gerald R. Nemec \(E-mail\)" cc: Subject: November Nominations Joan, Gerald; What is the game plan for November nominations? Do we want to go through the same deal as before and nominate on NWPL, get rejected, and renominate on Questar? Or, do we want to nominate on Questar and include a statement that we are nominating on Questar only because of last month's ordeal? Tom Brown and Wildhorse are supposed to close today - if they didn't get their late last Friday. Ken Krisa