Message-ID: <14632989.1075842778183.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:02:00 -0800 (PST) From: gerald.nemec@enron.com To: rab@beggslane.com Subject: Re: Staff Question re: 115/230 Cc: mark.knippa@enron.com, chris.hilgert@enron.com, bill@katzlaw.com, jastone@southernco.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: mark.knippa@enron.com, chris.hilgert@enron.com, bill@katzlaw.com, jastone@southernco.com X-From: Gerald Nemec X-To: "Russell A. Badders" @ENRON X-cc: Mark Knippa, Chris Hilgert, bill@katzlaw.com, JASTONE@southernco.com X-bcc: X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: NEMEC-G X-FileName: gnemec.nsf Russell, I reviewed this with our business guys and they were fine with what you represent here. We did not check this with Tom Balcerowiz and he needs to take a look at it. Have your technical people gotten with Tom yet on any of these issues? If not then we can run it down on this end. Our only concern was that reliability between Gulf's 230 kv system and AEC's 115 kv system was not addressed. It was our understanding that this was a question of the PSC staff. Are there plans to provide any information concerning this item, or is no information available from AEC for such assessment? Any word concerning WFEC's response to our petition or any filings they have made with the PSC? "Russell A. Badders" 03/21/2001 09:35 AM To: cc: Subject: Staff Question re: 115/230 Please review the attached document.? Mr. Bryant and possibly Tom on your end may want to see this before it goes.? I hope to transmit this to PSC Staff Thursday March 21, 2001.? Thanks Russell - staffissue.doc.doc