Message-ID: <25710573.1075842787324.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 00:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: william.bradford@enron.com
To: stephanie.miller@enron.com
Subject: RE: PG&E Baja Capacity
Cc: gerald.nemec@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: gerald.nemec@enron.com
X-From: William S Bradford
X-To: Stephanie Miller
X-cc: Gerald Nemec
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: gnemec.nsf

That was a side negotiation between Barry and Bob Barron at PG&E. It has 
nothing to do with the collateral requirement.

Bill


 -----Original Message-----
From:  Miller, Stephanie  
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Bradford, William S.
Cc: Nemec, Gerald
Subject: PG&E Baja Capacity

Mike Grigsby recalled that the capacity on the LDC (PG&E Baja path  was also 
included in this process. Do you know why it fell out of the proposed 
arrangement?