Message-ID: <5905668.1075842591817.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 08:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: ranabir.dutt@enron.com
To: dsullivan@totalise.co.uk
Subject: Put Option Value + Payment to be made by Condor
Cc: rob.taylor@enron.com, barbd@andrews-kurth.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: rob.taylor@enron.com, barbd@andrews-kurth.com
X-From: Ranabir Dutt
X-To: Katie Stowers@ECT, dsullivan@totalise.co.uk
X-cc: Rob Taylor, BARBD@andrews-kurth.com, Cris Sherman@ECT, Shonnie Daniel@ECT, Gerald Nemec@ECT
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: gnemec.nsf

Danny:

As you can see from the table below (I have also attached the worksheet)  the 
Adjusted Estimated Value is (for both projects) $72 mm, however the appraised 
value is $76 mm.  When the Trust exercises the Put Option, does PR-C/WR-C (or 
Condor) have to give the Trust $76 mm (i.e. the appraised FMV) or can we just 
give the Adjusted Estimated Value of $72 mm and be done with it.



Can ENE pay the interest accrued on the Notes and Certificates or do they 
have to be paid by Condor/PR-C/WR-C?
With regards to the ongoing Equity Obligation -- can ENE take on that 
responsibility or does it have to be Condor?

Cris, 

from an accounting perspective do you have any concern.  I would like ENE to 
pay the interest and the ongoing equity obligation, if possible, as it would 
reduce the interest/expenses that we have to pay to Condor.  However, I do 
want to achieve the overall objectives, which are (1) keep the assets 
off-balance sheet, (2) not create a negative funds-flow; and (3) maintain 
flexibility from a FAS 66 perspective in our sale to Northern Border.

Katie:

Could you find out the Ongoing Equity Obligations on ENE's portion for Powder 
(which I presume is none, but would like it reconfirmed) and Wind?

Thanks

Ranabir