Message-ID: <24084264.1075842598166.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 04:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: ken.choyce@enron.com
To: pludwick1@compuserve.com
Subject: Hanover/Enron Contract
Cc: gerald.nemec@enron.com, shonnie.daniel@enron.com, brian.bierbach@enron.com, 
	mark.whitt@enron.com, kdurant@vcn.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bcc: gerald.nemec@enron.com, shonnie.daniel@enron.com, brian.bierbach@enron.com, 
	mark.whitt@enron.com, kdurant@vcn.com
X-From: Ken Choyce
X-To: pludwick1@compuserve.com
X-cc: Gerald Nemec, Shonnie Daniel, Brian Bierbach, Mark Whitt, kdurant@vcn.com
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: gnemec.nsf

Paul,

Enron has received Hanover=01,s e-mail (with attached spreadsheet) with reg=
ard=20
to requested changes in the contract.  Please be advised, that Enron views=
=20
this contract as a long term contract and not a "let=01,s get started"=20
agreement. Our interpretation of the existing contract is significantly=20
different than Hanover=01,s.  We would be willing to sit down and discuss t=
he=20
existing contract and your comments concerning the contract.    Please feel=
=20
free to call me with any questions or comments you may have.   Thanks



Ken Choyce