Message-ID: <6774226.1075852326026.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: judy.thorne@enron.com
To: gerald.nemec@enron.com
Subject: FW: ENA Upstream Reciprocal Keep Whole
Cc: nelson.ferries@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: nelson.ferries@enron.com
X-From: Thorne, Judy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JTHORNE>
X-To: Nemec, Gerald </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Gnemec>
X-cc: Ferries, Nelson </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Nferrie>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \GNEMEC (Non-Privileged)\Inbox
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: GNEMEC (Non-Privileged).pst

Gerald,
 
I spoke with Nelson about developing consistency in the language for all of our contracts. As for the Notice of Variance section, we would like to use "email, fax, phone or where an agency agreement governs, direct access to Operators" for all of our Reciprocal Keep Whole confirmations. Please feel free to reword, but our intent is to excuse the Producer if we have executed an agency agreement because we are contractually obligated to get that information.
 
Thanks,
Judy
-----Original Message-----
From: Billyoung3@aol.com [mailto:Billyoung3@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 10:14 AM
To: Thorne, Judy
Subject: Re: ENA Upstream Reciprocal Keep Whole


Judy - 
      Thanks for the quick response. Attached are a few wording changes we would offer. Let me know what you think. What is the effective date? 

Thanks, 
                 Bill 

William N. Young, III 
Gathering and Energy Marketing CO Energy, Inc. 
4355 Sylvanfield Drive, Suite 110 
Houston, Texas 77014 
281-586-7155 phone 
281-586-7701 fax 
281-804-8812 cell 