Message-ID: <13932191.1075842829282.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 09:26:00 -0800 (PST)
From: anncrawford@aec.ca
To: gerald.nemec@enron.com
Subject: RE: Transaction Agreement - Opal 5 Year Deal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: "Crawford, Ann" <AnnCrawford@aec.ca>
X-To: "'Gerald.Nemec@enron.com'" <Gerald.Nemec@enron.com>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Notes inbox
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: gnemec.nsf

Gerald,

This looks fine from our end.  Go ahead with the execution copies.

Regarding the ENFOLIO, I forwarded my comments on to our lawyer.

I am still hoping to send out our response by Thursday or Friday.

Should I address that response to your attention?

Thanks,

Ann






-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald.Nemec@enron.com [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 1:51 PM
To: Crawford, Ann
Cc: Mark.Whitt@enron.com; Russell.Diamond@enron.com
Subject: Re: Transaction Agreement - Opal 5 Year Deal



Ann,  Attached is the confirm with revisions.  I tweaked the language to
make it clear that the transaction is governed by the existing master until
we get the new one executed.  Please review and if OK, I can prepare
executables for signature.  Please keep me updated on the status of the
review of the new master.  Thanks.

(See attached file: ENRON OPAL 5YR C.doc)