Message-ID: <11067329.1075842665067.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: renee.enron@enron.com
Subject: Re: Sofregaz Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Gerald Nemec
X-To: Renee Alfaro AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL @ ENRON
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: gnemec.nsf

Renee, Did Sofregaz ask for these changes?  If so did they recommend this 
specific language?




From: Renee Alfaro AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL on 04/30/99 04:27 PM
To: Gerald Nemec@ECT, Rusty Belflower AT ENRON_DEVELOPMENT@CCMAIL
cc:  
Subject: Sofregaz Agreement




Please find attached the latest draft of the proposed Capital Construction 
Term Rate Agreement with Sofregaz US.  I have not yet sent these changes back 
to Sofregaz yet.  Our (EECC) legal department approves these changes, but I 
wanted to make sure Gerald and Enron Storage Co. approved these changes.  The 
only changes made were to Section 19, General Indemnity.  This is a 
comparison copy showing the changes from our standard Capital Construction 
Agreement.

Gerald, the contract is with EECC, but Enron Storage Co. could use an 
Affiliate Work Offer.  I just realized that there is no Exhibit showing the 
Work Offer form, so I will correct that and make the work offers Exhibit F. I 
will attach a copy of our affiliate work offer for your review.

Please get back to me with any comments.  I will then reply back to Sofregaz.

Thanks.
Renee
x67281

(See attached file: compare02.doc)(See attached file: Exhfaffl.doc)
 - compare02.doc - Exhfaffl.doc