Message-ID: <6659358.1075842907102.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:51:00 -0800 (PST) From: gerald.nemec@enron.com To: dclearfield@wolfblock.com Subject: Re: Compression Services Agreement for Tennessee Gas Pipeline Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Gerald Nemec X-To: "Daniel Clearfield" @ENRON X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_2\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: NEMEC-G X-FileName: gnemec.nsf Thanks for the review. A more formal response is not necessary at this time. "Daniel Clearfield" 03/23/2001 12:04 PM To: cc: Subject: Re: Compression Services Agreement for Tennessee Gas Pipeline Gerry, I've looked over the agreement and still don't believe that it raises any PUC regulatory issues. If you need more (or a more formal version of this e-mail) please contact me. Daniel Clearfield, Esq. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen LLP 212 Locust St., Suite 200 Harrisburg, PA 17101 (717) 237-7173 (717) 237-7161 fax >>> 03/20/01 12:59PM >>> Dan, Per our discussion, attached is the Compressor Services Agreement between Enron Compression Services Company and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company. This is a rough draft at this point, but should give you a good idea of the structure of this deal. Note that Section 3.4 will be removed as this is no longer part of the deal. (See attached file: EP comp agmt1.doc)