Message-ID: <9789725.1075842677326.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 04:14:00 -0700 (PDT) From: gerald.nemec@enron.com To: jamie.ginsberg@enron.com Subject: Re: FW: Trailblazer CA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Gerald Nemec X-To: Jamie Ginsberg X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Dec2000_June2001_1\Notes Folders\Sent X-Origin: NEMEC-G X-FileName: gnemec.nsf Attached is Ron's email and my response to him. ---------------------- Forwarded by Gerald Nemec/HOU/ECT on 04/24/2000 11:13 AM --------------------------- Gerald Nemec 04/19/2000 02:06 PM To: "Brown, Ronald" @ ENRON cc: Subject: Re: FW: Trailblazer CA Ron, Couple of comments. 1. Enitity Name - You noted that Trailblazer is a limited partnership. The name should designate limited partnership in some form (e.g. Trailblazer Pipeline Company, L.P.) Also for an LP the General Partner will need to sign to make it binding. The signature block should read as follows: Trailblazer Pipeline Company, L.P. by its General Partner, _________________________ 2. The limitation on consequential damages limits any remedy under this agreement. The only types of damages in a situation like this is really consequential. I think it would benefit both parties to leave this limitation out of the agreement. If you would like to discuss these issues, please contact me at (713) 853-3512. Thank You. "Brown, Ronald" on 04/18/2000 01:54:06 PM To: "'gerald.nemec@enron.com'" cc: Subject: FW: Trailblazer CA My comments are shown redlined. Let me know if you have any problems with my changes. -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Nemec [mailto:Gerald.Nemec@enron.com] Sent: Friday, April 14, 2000 10:05 AM To: ronald_brown@kindermorgan.com Cc: Jamie Ginsberg Subject: Trailblazer CA Per Jaime Ginsberg's request, I am forwarding our form of Confidentiality Agreement for your review. (See attached file: TrailBlazerCA.doc) - TrailBlazerCA.doc