Message-ID: <29735757.1075852331035.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT) From: gerald.nemec@enron.com To: rudwell.johnson@enron.com Subject: RE: Cargill Guaranty Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Nemec, Gerald X-To: Johnson, Rudwell X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \GNEMEC (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: NEMEC-G X-FileName: GNEMEC (Non-Privileged).pst Rudwell, Attached is the executable form of the guaranty. Please fill in the Cargill information and forward to Bridgeline for execution. Also, I didn't know what the effective date should be. Let me know if you have any questions. -----Original Message----- From: Johnson, Rudwell Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 9:13 AM To: Nemec, Gerald Cc: Stephens, Jeff Subject: RE: Cargill Guaranty Gerald! I took a look at the proposed changes and also spoke with my counterpart at Cargill, we are fine with the changes. Please execute a guaranty in the amount of $8MM. -----Original Message----- From: Nemec, Gerald Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:03 PM To: Johnson, Rudwell Subject: Cargill Guaranty Rudwell, Attached is a redline of the guaranty with my comments. Specifically they are: 1. I am OK with including reasonable attorney fees, but they must be included in the $2.5 million dollar cap. 2. The use of subtantially in Paragraph 2 seems redundant. The notice requires reasonable detail. To add subtantial compliance on top of that is redundant. I am OK with the other changes. Please review and let me know if you have any questions. << File: Bridgeline(Cargill).doc >>