Message-ID: <9174468.1075852331057.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 14:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: gerald.nemec@enron.com
To: rudwell.johnson@enron.com
Subject: Cargill Guaranty
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Nemec, Gerald </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=GNEMEC>
X-To: Johnson, Rudwell </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rjohnso2>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \GNEMEC (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items
X-Origin: NEMEC-G
X-FileName: GNEMEC (Non-Privileged).pst

Rudwell,  Attached is a redline of the guaranty with my comments.  Specifically they are:

	1.  I am OK with including reasonable attorney fees, but they must be included in the $2.5 million dollar cap.  
	2.  The use of subtantially in Paragraph 2 seems redundant.  The notice requires reasonable detail.  To add subtantial compliance on top of that is redundant.
	
I am OK with the other changes.  Please review and let me know if you have any questions.