Message-ID: <25626181.1075859166577.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 08:22:27 -0800 (PST) From: gerald.nemec@enron.com To: stuart.zisman@enron.com Subject: RE: Dow Amendment Cc: brian.redmond@enron.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: brian.redmond@enron.com X-From: Nemec, Gerald X-To: Zisman, Stuart X-cc: Redmond, Brian X-bcc: X-Folder: \Gerald_Nemec_Jan2002\Nemec, Gerald\Sent Items X-Origin: Nemec-G X-FileName: gnemec (Non-Privileged).pst Stuart, I have reviewed your comments and incorporated as appropriate. Please review attached. The following are my comments on your changes that I did not accept: 1. The replacement of Section 3.1 and 3.2 with Section (a), (b), etc. is confusing, but unfortunately the September 1, 2000 amendment already made this replacement. I am staying with that format. 2. Since the Original Agreement was awkardly amended in September of 2000, I think the references to the "Original Agreement as amended by Amendment #2" are helpful, so l retained them. Let me know if you have any questions. I am OK to send this to Dow if you are. -----Original Message----- From: Zisman, Stuart Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:13 PM To: Nemec, Gerald; Redmond, Brian Subject: RE: Dow Amendment Attached are my comments. Obviously, I haven't reviewed the original lease so I am providing comments from a less than optimal vantage point. Regards Stuart << File: Dow Lease SRZ Comments.doc >> -----Original Message----- From: Nemec, Gerald Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 11:51 AM To: Zisman, Stuart; Redmond, Brian Subject: Dow Amendment Attached is a draft of the Dow Amendment. I used portions of their proposed amendment which they sent of August 8. Date and prices are left blank for negotiation. Let me know if you have any questions. << File: Dow Amd.doc >>