Message-ID: <29956742.1075852333090.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 15:14:33 -0700 (PDT) From: gerald.nemec@enron.com To: lisa.druzbik@enron.com Subject: RE: LOI Oakhill Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Nemec, Gerald X-To: Druzbik, Lisa X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \GNEMEC (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: NEMEC-G X-FileName: GNEMEC (Non-Privileged).pst Lisa, Your changes look fine to me. I added the sentence to make it clear that ECS would not be owning and operating that portion of the equipment. It wasn't clear to me from the section which indicate we will be arranging for the installation of the compressors. -----Original Message----- From: Druzbik, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:46 PM To: Nemec, Gerald Cc: Hilgert, Chris; Freeman, Ben; Knippa, Mark Subject: RE: LOI Oakhill Gerald, Thanks for your comments. I've made a few revisions (hightlighted in BLUE); in particular, I've clarified the Capital Expenditures Section 4 (we want to differentiate the transmission line from the remainder of the capital estimates). We are still working on the items in red and in yellow. << File: Oakhill LOI (10-3-01) Lisa.doc >> One question for you in Section 8. Why did you add the following sentence "Oakhill would maintain ownership and responsibility for all maintenance of the reciprocating gas compressors throughout the contract term"? Its not clear to me why we'd include a sentence on gas compression. Let me know. Thanks, Lisa -----Original Message----- From: Nemec, Gerald Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:58 AM To: Druzbik, Lisa Cc: Hilgert, Chris; Knippa, Mark Subject: LOI Oakhill Lisa, I made significant revisions to this form. Please review and lets discuss. << File: OakhillLOI(10-3-01).doc >>