Message-ID: <13687577.1075841378925.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:13:43 -0800 (PST)
From: stuart.zisman@enron.com
To: chris.meyer@enron.com
Subject: RE: Bridgeline
Cc: joe.parks@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: joe.parks@enron.com
X-From: Zisman, Stuart </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=SZISMAN>
X-To: Meyer, Chris </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cmeyer>
X-cc: Parks, Joe </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jparks>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \ExMerge - Parks, Joe\Deleted Items
X-Origin: PARKS-J
X-FileName: joe parks 6-26-02.pst

I am not certain that we will ultimately approach Gulf South on the pad gas but it seems to make sense that we talk to them about the storage/transport deal.

Stuart


 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Meyer, Chris  
Sent:	Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:05 PM
To:	Parks, Joe; Zisman, Stuart
Subject:	Bridgeline

Since it appears we are going to approach Gulf South about the purchase of pad gas, shouldn't we also gauge their interest in ENA's storage/transport position, including any available molecules?

cmm