Message-ID: <8768609.1075858437884.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 05:32:00 -0800 (PST)
From: susan.pereira@enron.com
To: leslie.robinson@enron.com
Subject: Re: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Susan W Pereira
X-To: Leslie Robinson
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Susan_Pereira_Jun2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Pereira-S
X-FileName: spereir.nsf

The only info I had from you is that we owed ProEnergy 11,035 mmbtu.  I asked 
you if we had any other outstanding imbalances with Cinergy or its 
precursors.  You gave me the Onyx volume, but I had already negotiated the 
deal.  Whose imbalance is the 10,644 mmbtu??

Susan Pereira





Leslie Robinson@ENRON
11/10/2000 11:34 AM
To: Susan W Pereira/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:  
Subject: Re: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC
  

Daniel Kieran with Cinergy/Producer's Energy called me because he wanted 
clarification on something in the contract.  He thinks were forgetting about 
the imbalance due LRP of 10,644.  I thought you said the reason the price was 
so low was because that imbalance had been taken into consideration, so in a 
sense we are netting the two.  Is this correct?  Also, was the Oryx imbalance 
of (770) taken into consideration in the agreement below?



Susan W Pereira@ECT
10/20/2000 03:15 PM
To: Leslie Robinson/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:  

Subject: ProEnergy/Cinergy imbalance on LRC


Cinergy has agreed to settle the imbalance of 11,035 mmbtu owed them at 
$1.77/mmbtu.  Please prepare the paperwork showing us paying them $19,531.95 
to clear this imbalance.

Thanks,

Susan Pereira

p.s.- you can just address the letter to Daniel Kieran