Message-ID: <33276753.1075852244209.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 15:17:31 -0700 (PDT) From: debra.perlingiere@enron.com To: steve.gillespie@enron.com Subject: RE: Louisville Gas & Electric Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Perlingiere, Debra X-To: Gillespie, Steve X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \DPERLIN (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: PERLINGIERE-D X-FileName: DPERLIN (Non-Privileged).pst Tell them to submit language they would like to see and I will review it. Have them email you and cc me. dp -----Original Message----- From: Gillespie, Steve Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:24 PM To: Perlingiere, Debra Subject: RE: Louisville Gas & Electric Debra, My contact at LG&E has requested the default pricing in the contract be switched from "spot" to some type of "true-cost" verbiage. His point was that if he is buying 10,000 on a given day from Enron and ENA only delivers 5,000 by the terms of the present contract Enron would be responsible for the "spot" cost of replacement gas or the gas daily average for that zone. My contact points out that the market for gas when this purchase is to take place could be significantly higher (or lower) than gas daily and that is the cost they want to pay or receive. Is something like this request possible? sg -----Original Message----- From: Perlingiere, Debra Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:42 PM To: Gillespie, Steve Subject: Louisville Gas & Electric FYI, I have started negotiations with LG&E, however they have not resolved the issue of party name(s) on their part. I will keep you apprised of my progress. dp Debra Perlingiere Enron North America Legal 1400 Smith Street, EB 3885 Houston, Texas 77002 dperlin@enron 713-853-7658 713-646-3490 Fax