Message-ID: <15423315.1075849735256.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 01:17:00 -0800 (PST)
From: slgoza@tva.gov
To: rogers.herndon@enron.com
Subject: RE: TVA' s Bid
Cc: kevin.m.presto@enron.com, eacreel@tva.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: kevin.m.presto@enron.com, eacreel@tva.gov
X-From: "Goza, Stuart L." <slgoza@tva.gov>
X-To: "'Rogers.Herndon@enron.com'" <Rogers.Herndon@enron.com>
X-cc: Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com, "Creel, Elizabeth A." <eacreel@tva.gov>
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Kevin_Presto_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: PRESTO-K
X-FileName: kpresto.nsf

I assume that a 95% availability for all months, with only the major
maintenance outages excluded, and LD energy would bring the value up to the
$6.50/kw-month, but I have not requested an analysis of this type product.

If you think that would work for Enron, I will ask for the analysis and
provide a bid for that product.

> ----------
> From:  Rogers.Herndon@enron.com[SMTP:Rogers.Herndon@enron.com]
> Sent:  Friday, January 19, 2001 7:04 AM
> To:  Goza, Stuart L.
> Cc:  Kevin.M.Presto@enron.com
> Subject:  RE: TVA' s Bid
>
>
> Stuart -
>
> Does TVA have a counter-proposal that would increaase the value to EPMI's
> original offer?
>
> Rogers Herndon
>