Message-ID: <15055308.1075852826464.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:16:39 -0700 (PDT) From: leslie.hansen@enron.com To: m..presto@enron.com Subject: Reliant's concerns re EOL Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Hansen, Leslie X-To: Presto, Kevin M. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \KPRESTO (Non-Privileged)\Deleted Items X-Origin: Presto-K X-FileName: KPRESTO (Non-Privileged).pst Kevin: As I mentioned in a voice mail a couple of weeks ago, Reliant has expressed some concerns about the current EnronOnline notification process for changes to power products. My initial response after discussions with EnronOnline was to explain to Reliant that EnronOnline cannot change the notification process from them and to suggest alternative internal measures that Reliant can implement to monitor product changes. (According to EnronOnline, no other objections to the notification process have been received by EOL.) I had heard nothing else for a couple of weeks, and to date Reliant's use of EOL apparently has not been affected. However, one of Reliant's attorneys, Dede Russo, called me yesterday to discuss the issue again. I spoke with Rogers Herndon yesterday about Reliant's concerns, and Rogers perceives a real risk that Reliant will discontinue its use of EOL if we do not respond to their concerns. I would like to discuss this issue with you briefly and suggest that we may want to meet with Savita Puthgai of EnronOnline to consider how best to respond to Reliant. Thanks, Leslie