Message-ID: <8754866.1075841441216.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:51:28 -0800 (PST) From: m..presto@enron.com To: john.lavorato@enron.com Subject: RE: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Presto, Kevin M. X-To: Lavorato, John X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \ExMerge - Presto, Kevin M.\Sent Items X-Origin: PRESTO-K X-FileName: kevin presto 2-7-02.pst shapiro is a lazier version of Steffes. -----Original Message----- From: Lavorato, John Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:26 AM To: Presto, Kevin M. Subject: RE: But what about Shapiro -----Original Message----- From: Presto, Kevin M. Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:11 AM To: Lavorato, John Subject: RE: Christi Nicolay and Sarah Novosel are the two best regulatory people. In terms of pushing the timing, political clout is going to be more important which in the past would have come from Kean and Lay. Obviously, that will not work anymore. I have a good relationship with Larcamp (FERC head of Staff) and might be able to help with the politics. I think FERC is going to want to hear directly from the new owner. If we want speed, I recommend we use the expertise of Christi and Sarah combined with the overall political clout of the new owner. You are not off base with Steffes at all. -----Original Message----- From: Lavorato, John Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:57 AM To: Presto, Kevin M.; Belden, Tim Subject: I've never been a big fan of Shapiro, however, I wonder if he could help with the speed of the regulatory process. Steffes seems to talk more than act. Am I way off base. My issues with Rick have never been related to competence but were based on costs of his unit.