Message-ID: <27093473.1075852832396.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 03:56:23 -0700 (PDT) From: m..presto@enron.com To: l..nicolay@enron.com Subject: RE: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Presto, Kevin M. X-To: Nicolay, Christi L. X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \KPRESTO (Non-Privileged)\Sent Items X-Origin: Presto-K X-FileName: KPRESTO (Non-Privileged).pst We can't make a daily capacity market in the current environment. -----Original Message----- From: Nicolay, Christi L. Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:43 PM To: Presto, Kevin M. Subject: Kevin -- In the Dynegy v. ComEd complaint, Dynegy states: "Dynegy typically only sells capacity on an annual or seasonal basis for $1MM to $2 MM per 50 MW. Dynegy does not typically sell capacity on a daily basis." Enron's argument against Dynegy will be that the FERC network transmission agreement does not give Dynegy a right to "capacity payments." Aside from that, maybe Enron can make a daily capacity market, since Dynegy clearly isn't making one. (And in the meantime, we of course continue to try killing "icap")