Message-ID: <26280662.1075854852523.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: m..presto@enron.com
To: bill.rust@enron.com
Subject: RE: LM6000s in Homestead
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Presto, Kevin M. </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KPRESTO>
X-To: Rust, Bill </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Brust>
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Presto, Kevin M (Non-Privileged)\Presto, Kevin M.\Sent Items
X-Origin: Presto-K
X-FileName: Presto, Kevin M (Non-Privileged).pst

I would support 90 MW at Homestead.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Rust, Bill  
Sent:	Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:03 AM
To:	Presto, Kevin M.
Subject:	LM6000s in Homestead

Kevin,

Greg Krause asked me what the desk thought of 90 MW of LM6000 generation in Homestead FL. I told him that the transmission looked very favorable for 90 MW (w/o other generation added in the area). What do you think about having the generation there from the commodity perspective?

Bill Rust