Message-ID: <27431484.1075852246059.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 20:45:06 -0700 (PDT) From: ann.s.chen@accenture.com To: dutch.quigley@enron.com Subject: Questions for the Simulation Model Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: ann.s.chen@accenture.com@ENRON X-To: Quigley, Dutch X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \DQUIGLE (Non-Privileged)\Quigley, Dutch\BMR X-Origin: QUIGLEY-D X-FileName: DQUIGLE (Non-Privileged).pst Hi Dutch -- Since you offered to answer some of my questions over e-mail, I will take you up on it! I would still like to get some of your time Monday or Tuesday to go into more detailed discussion. Question 1: When we talk about "the market" reacting to events, what are the prices that we are talking about? From a simulation standpoint, I am trying to figure out what prices we need to show as being affected by these many events. Is it the forward curve? Is it the spot market price? Is the bid/offer prices for the various instruments? And, if we are having users trade basis, we will need different prices for different locations, right? Question 2: Given that the calculation of VaR is rather involved, we decided that it would not be worth our effort to have that calculation in the model. However, we understand that the user needs to 1) know their VaR and 2) know that they need to make sure they stay within their VaR limit. So, we will need to set a VaR limit for the user and "fake" the individual VaR to reflect their risk exposure. I had a talk with Erro McLaughlin about this. He made a good point that if our user are not expected to understand the complexity of how a VaR is calculated, will they know how to control their VaR, i.e. if a user sees that he is over his VaR limit, what should he do to get it back within the limit. Is is as simple as not being too long or too short? And if that is the case, would it be sufficient to use position reports/tallies as a proxy for risk exposure, instead of VaR? One possible way to fake VaR may be to adjust the VaR number to reflect how exposed the user is. So if they are X dollars long, they have a VaR of Y. If they change their position so that they are now 1.5X long, they have a VaR of 1.5Y. Perhaps we can also throw in a factor that takes into account market volatility. What are your thoughts? Lastly, when could you meet with me next week? I would really like to meet on Tuesday, if possible. Thanks so much for your time, Dutch. Have a terrific weekend! Ann This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.