Message-ID: <5528343.1075858652828.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 07:29:59 -0700 (PDT) From: bob.hansen@enron.com To: richard.ring@enron.com Subject: RE: MD Index Product - Scheduling Fee Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Hansen, Bob X-To: Ring, Richard X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \RRING (Non-Privileged)\EESIISOPJM X-Origin: Ring-R X-FileName: RRING (Non-Privileged)1.pst Great...Thanks! From: Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate on 10/10/2001 09:20 AM To: Bob Hansen/HOU/EES@EES cc: Michele Raque/ENRON@enronXgate, Narsimha Misra/ENRON@enronXgate Subject: RE: MD Index Product - Scheduling Fee Bob, I think that for the moment the $0.25/MWh for the scheduling fee component is fine to utilize. Michelle is in the process of reviewing all BGE scheduling requirements and within the next few days should have be able to determine the accuracy of the $0.25/MWh scheduling fee component. Richard -----Original Message----- From: Hansen, Bob Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 9:10 AM To: Pan, Liqun; Ring, Richard; Raque, Michele Cc: Johnson, Gillian Subject: MD Index Product - Scheduling Fee Good Morning.... As a placeholder, Narsimha previously suggested $0.25/MWH for the scheduling fee component of the fixed "Management Fee". Do you think this is still a reasonable number to use? If so, we would use it in our notional estimates, and Deal Management would use the same value for executable pricing. Thanks! Bob