Message-ID: <3680021.1075858659094.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:47:00 -0700 (PDT) From: stacey.bolton@enron.com To: elliot.mainzer@enron.com, richard.ring@enron.com Subject: FW: TX Disclosure Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-From: Stacey Bolton X-To: Elliot Mainzer , Richard Ring X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \RRING (Non-Privileged)\EESIRenewableEnergy X-Origin: Ring-R X-FileName: RRING (Non-Privileged)1.pst fyi.. Talked to Trish about Green offerings/Environmental Products. They= might be looking in to this in January. Keep this in the hopper. It's fo= r smaller customers. =20 Stacey Bolton Environmental Strategies Enron Corp 713-853-9916 direct=20 713-303-2632 cell=20 sbolton@enron.com =20 -----Original Message----- From: Bolton, Stacey=20 Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:42 PM To: Collins, Patricia Cc: Ogenyi, Gloria; Ring, Richard; Mathis, Heather; Castano, Marianne Subject: TX Disclosure Trish: =20 Yikes....hope you are surviving! You'll need coffee after this product lau= nch. Here's the lowdown w/ labels in TX. Your 1st label will be a project= ion or guestimation of what you anticipate delivering to customers. I'd ge= t w/ Richard Ring on the desk (under Rogers Herndon) to verify that you guy= s will only be purchasing system mix. You might already have done so. On = the fuel mix label (do you have a copy?....I'm attaching if you do not), re= place the heading "Sources of power generation" with "Projected sources of = power generation". Same w/ emissions....replace "emissions and waste per k= Wh generated" with "projected emissions and waste per kWh generated". EES = must then practice "due diligence" in its acquisition of power to ensure yo= ur projection is as close as possible to your actual. You will change to h= istorical data on the label after one year (12/31/02). You have some leewa= y during the pilot as the final label calculation rule has not been adopted= yet -- though it is unlikely that these requirements will change. =20 I must get in one other plug. You might seriously want to consider a green= product option. In Texas, we have a system by which it is more cost-effec= tive to purchase renewable power. That is how entities such as Green Mount= ain (label attached below) have been able to launch a 100% wind product. R= eliant (label attached below) is offering a 100% green product in TXU's ter= ritory for only 1 cent more per kWH. Reliant's offering is for residential= only. EPMI and Enron Wind have 135 MW wind facility and you might want to= price a premium option for the smaller commodity customers from this facil= ity or from the market in general. I am GLAD to hook you up with the intern= al folks that can help you w/ purchases for renewable energy. We're having= a meeting on Thursday from 12-3 to discuss renewable origination and tradi= ng opportunities in EB 8c1 if you can tear away. Lunch will be served. Le= t me know. =20 Regards, Stacey Bolton Environmental Strategies Enron Corp 713-853-9916 direct=20 713-303-2632 cell=20 sbolton@enron.com https://www.greenmountain.com/gmec/tx/tx_efl.jsp Green Mountain's Electric= ity Facts Label for TX https://www.reliant.com/Residential_Secure/1,1667,OUTF-productList,00.html?= personId=3D&provider=3D44372&submit2=3DContinue&promoCode=3D Reliant's res= idential label in TXU's territory http://www.puc.state.tx.us/rules/rulemake/22816/22816arc/110100%20stra.rtf = Proposed Rule =20