Message-ID: <27432553.1075861004943.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 12:46:42 -0800 (PST) From: kay.quigley@enron.com To: richard.ring@enron.com Subject: RE: EPA RFI Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Quigley, Kay X-To: Ring, Richard X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Richard_Ring_Mar2002\Ring, Richard\EESIRenewableEnergy X-Origin: Ring-R X-FileName: rring (Non-Privileged).pst I think you are right- I have been instructed to steer away from government entities due to the time it takes to close one We are very focused in 4th quarter now so maybe we will be able to work on them next year. From: Richard Ring/ENRON@enronXgate on 11/05/2001 01:00 PM To: Kay Quigley/HOU/EES@EES cc: John McCarthy/HOU/EES@EES Subject: RE: EPA RFI Kay, I was informed that EESI is no longer interested in doing "any" deals that involve the Federal Government. Do you have any insight? Regards, Richard -----Original Message----- From: Quigley, Kay Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:04 AM To: Ring, Richard Subject: EPA RFI Richard - I will need your help on responding to this request- there are a lot of questions I cannot field. I can provide the fixed gen pricing for the building with LF 65%, however all the other questions center around renewable questions. You will need to take lead on majority. John McCarthy works in EES and prepares formal responses to inquiries of this nature If you can help him with those questions, he is very quick at putting the general info needed on Enron together and putting in a nice binded document with very speedy turnaround Let me know how you want to proceed- it's due 11/9 thanks Kq