Message-ID: <30083099.1075857213093.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 02:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: don.miller@enron.com
To: benjamin.rogers@enron.com
Subject: Plant Load Questions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Don Miller
X-To: Benjamin Rogers
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Benjamin_Rogers_Dec2000_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Rogers-B
X-FileName: brogers.nsf

---------------------- Forwarded by Don Miller/HOU/ECT on 10/23/2000 09:44 AM 
---------------------------


Chris Norris@ENRON_DEVELOPMENT
10/23/2000 09:35 AM
To: Don.Miller@ect.enron.com, Mitch.Robinson@ect.enron.com
cc: Ross.Newlin@enron.com 
Subject: Plant Load Questions

This info was asked on another.  Here is what we supplied and this is per the 
design not empirical.  Martin Dick is the design engineer at Nepco.  425 415 
3000 if questions.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Norris/ENRON_DEVELOPMENT on 
10/23/2000 09:39 AM ---------------------------


MartinD@nepco.com on 10/19/2000 03:39:40 PM
To: Chris.Norris@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Plant Load Questions


Based on the plant design (not measured values), the Full Load Parasitic
would be about 4,600 kW, the "Stand-By" Parasitic load would be about 385 kW
(power backfed through GSU Transformers). If the plant is held in "Stand-By"
without the GSU's energized, then the parasitic drops to about 85 kW.

Mike Connelly is expected back in Bothell tomorrow. He should be checking
his e-mail so you might want to sent him a message (if you haven't done so
already).