Message-ID: <32470026.1075857197065.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 00:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: thomas.suffield@enron.com
To: eric.ledain@enron.com, kate.chaney@enron.com, duncan.croasdale@enron.com, 
	miguel.vasquez@enron.com, adam.thomas@enron.com, 
	joseph.deffner@enron.com, lisa.bills@enron.com, 
	matthew.berry@enron.com, roger.ondreko@enron.com, 
	stanley.farmer@enron.com, chris.booth@enron.com, 
	mike.coleman@enron.com, greg.johnston@enron.com, 
	morris.clark@enron.com, humberto.cubillos-uejbe@enron.com, 
	chip.schneider@enron.com
Subject: Dave Delainey: Moore Power Project
Cc: don.miller@enron.com, jinsung.myung@enron.com, clement.lau@enron.com, 
	benjamin.rogers@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bcc: don.miller@enron.com, jinsung.myung@enron.com, clement.lau@enron.com, 
	benjamin.rogers@enron.com
X-From: Thomas M Suffield
X-To: Eric LeDain, Kate Chaney, Duncan Croasdale, Miguel Vasquez, Adam Thomas, Joseph Deffner, Lisa Bills, Matthew Berry, Roger Ondreko, Stanley Farmer, Chris Booth, Mike Coleman, Greg Johnston, Morris Richard Clark, Humberto Cubillos-Uejbe, Chip Schneider
X-cc: Don Miller, Jinsung Myung, Clement Lau, Benjamin Rogers
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Benjamin_Rogers_Dec2000_2\Notes Folders\Discussion threads
X-Origin: Rogers-B
X-FileName: brogers.nsf

Thank you for participating in the meeting/conference call yesterday 
afternoon.  I know it was helpful to go through the Synthetic Lease 
assumptions with everyone on board.  I met with Dave yesterday evening and 
briefly discussed his timing (ASAP) on meeting with Joe Sutton and his 
expectations (very high) on the Moore presentation.  I referenced oversizing 
the amount of the Synthetic Lease in order to keep the Canadian banks happy 
on the 90% Enron guarantee.  He agreed that the economics in the dash should 
still reflect the lower actual amount to be drawn down (currently U.S. 
$169MM).  Please note below his requests and delegated responsibilities in 
(brackets) below: 

Dave requested I revise the proposal (Adam) to show add'l NPV and IRR 
comparisons based on MAIN, ComEd and possibly ICF, and a 30 Yr, GENCO 
comparison (Kate).  Given the recent downward shift in some of the curves we 
may need to recompute our existing NPV and IRR #'s also (Kate).  Besides 
furnishing a graph for the referenced curves, I need to submit GENCO's 
capital cost comparison for peakers in the marketplace (Ben).  Further, based 
on the 30 year amortization, I need to show a graph of the build up of the 
components of capacity price and a break even earnings accrual price 
(Miguel).  I will need comparisons from GENCO of these two graphs as well as 
a chart comparing start costs, heat rate and Var. O&M contrasting the Moore 
Project with the GENCO peakers (Don and/or Jynsung or Clement or Ben).  In 
addition, Dave asked to get a Draft copy of the DASH ASAP (Chip).  Dave does 
not want to circulate the DASH for signature until he has met with Sutton. 

Thanks for your help.  
Thomas. 