Message-ID: <7459998.1075859519335.JavaMail.evans@thyme> Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 02:44:00 -0700 (PDT) From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com To: jason.wiesepape@enron.com, phil.demoes@enron.com, rogers.herndon@enron.com, john.berger@enron.com, janice.moore@enron.com Subject: City of Nashville - Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From: Elizabeth Sager X-To: Jason R Wiesepape, Phil DeMoes, Rogers Herndon, John Berger, Janice R Moore X-cc: X-bcc: X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Dec2000\Notes Folders\All documents X-Origin: Sager-E X-FileName: esager.nsf ----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000 09:39 AM ----- Michael Danielson 04/20/2000 08:27 AM To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT, Phil DeMoes/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Jason R Wiesepape/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Power Agreement FYI ---------------------- Forwarded by Michael Danielson/HOU/ECT on 04/20/2000 08:26 AM --------------------------- "Jenkins, Decosta" on 04/20/2000 08:03:45 AM To: "'Michael.Danielson@enron.com'" cc: "Dalrymple, James" , "Smith, Laura" Subject: Power Agreement Michael I received a call from your attorney a few days ago; she was inquiring about the status of the draft of the power sales agreement. . I misplaced her number; therefore I did not get back to her. Please apologize to her for me. We have not spent much time with your draft because we feel our positions are so far apart that NES's time was better spent working with those suppliers that understood the program and were comfortable with the program. We have one contract signed and are negotiating with two other suppliers. Is there any point to sending ENRON a copy of the agreement NES is will to sign or has ENRON decided it has very little interest in the program as it is structured?