Message-ID: <5709524.1075853398955.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 07:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To: brenda.whitehead@enron.com
Subject: Re: CRC letter
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Elizabeth Sager
X-To: Brenda Whitehead
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sager-E
X-FileName: esager.nsf

----- Forwarded by Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 02:50 PM -----

	Christian Yoder
	08/09/2000 01:45 PM
		 
		 To: Elizabeth Sager/HOU/ECT@ECT
		 cc: 
		 Subject: Re: CRC letter

There is an internal political risk that if we send out this letter the way 
it is written, Legal will be blamed for terminating a lucrative trading 
relationship.  I would like to manage this risk by putting back into the 
letter a bunch of self serving nonesense that will make it easier for the CRC 
guy to show the letter to his boss, while still getting our bottom line legal 
point across.    Please help me think this out carefully.----cgy
---------------------- Forwarded by Christian Yoder/HOU/ECT on 08/09/2000 
11:41 AM ---------------------------
   
	Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.
	
	From:  RAISLERK@sullcrom.com                           08/09/2000 06:54 AM
	

To: Christian.Yoder@enron.com
cc:  
Subject: Re: CRC letter


Revised pursuant to our discussions.

>>> <Christian.Yoder@enron.com> 08/08 7:08 PM >>>

(See attached file: Colorado River Commission Trading Authorization.doc)

Please review and provide any comments.  ----cgy



----------------------------------

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and contains information
that may be privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and notify us
immediately.

 - Colorado River Commission.rtf