Message-ID: <8890594.1075853413430.JavaMail.evans@thyme>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 08:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: elizabeth.sager@enron.com
To: lcw4@pge.com
Subject: RE: PG&E and Enron Standstill Agreement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Elizabeth Sager
X-To: "Witalis, Lawrence (Law)" <LCW4@pge.com>@ENRON
X-cc: 
X-bcc: 
X-Folder: \Elizabeth_Sager_Nov2001\Notes Folders\All documents
X-Origin: Sager-E
X-FileName: esager.nsf

In accordance with my voice mail, here is a revised standstill that 
incorporates the concept I referred to in my voice mail.  Please give me a 
call after you've had a chance to review.  

Thanks
Elizabeth Sager
713 853 6349





	"Witalis, Lawrence (Law)" <LCW4@pge.com>
	05/08/2001 02:38 PM
		 
		 To: "'Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com'" <Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com>
		 cc: "Anderson, David W (Law)" <DWA3@pge.com>, "Pearce, Karola (Law)" 
<KKP2@pge.com>
		 Subject: RE: PG&E and Enron Canadian Gas Master


Elizabeth:  Good to hear from you.  David Anderson is immersed in the
agreement, and he should be the one youwork with on it (415-973-6659;
dwa@pge.com).  By the way, we seem to have stalled a bit on finalizing the
stand-still agreement, which, as I last understood it, had only one
remaining issue, namely, the wording of the drawing provision for the LCs.
Can we get that one behind us, also?  Thanks.  Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com [mailto:Elizabeth.Sager@enron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 6:24 AM
To: LCW4@pge.com
Subject: RE: PG&E and Enron Canadian Gas Master



Hi Larry


I spoke with Peter Keohane and Mark Powell from our Canadian office and
they would be available at any time today, Tues the 8th , to go over the
Canadian Gas Master between ECC and PG&E.  Let me know what time works for
you.

Thanks
Elizabeth
713 853 6349